Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
The Farce of "Modern Art"
It's not really art if the judges mistake the stand the art is supposed to be displayed on for a piece of art itself. More to the point, the judges who make the mistake shouldn't be judging art.
That's exactly what happened recently, as the BBC reports:

What Passes for Modern Art
Do you think that if Leonardo submitted the Mona Lisa nowadays, the Royal Academy would ditch the painting and judge the packing crate?
That's exactly what happened recently, as the BBC reports:
An artist's sculpture has been rejected by the Royal Academy of Arts which has instead opted to display the wooden support it was put on.Here's the sculpture and the stand it was supposed to sit on.
David Hensel, 64, from East Grinstead, West Sussex, was told the laughing head would be part of the summer exhibition.
But at a preview he found that just a piece of wood intended to support the head was on display on the plinth.
The Academy said the judging panel assumed the two pieces were separate and decided the support was better.

What Passes for Modern Art

Do you think that if Leonardo submitted the Mona Lisa nowadays, the Royal Academy would ditch the painting and judge the packing crate?


